Annex
Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA) Regulatory Requirements
This annex gives the adopter a single per-regime view of Texas's comprehensive state AI statute, the Texas Responsible Artificial Intelligence Governance Act (TRAIGA), HB 149 of the 89th Legislature (2025), effective 1 January 2026. It sits alongside the other ai/jurisdictions/ US-state annexes (Colorado, California, New York City). Colorado is a two-regime jurisdiction (see ai/jurisdictions/annex-ai-us-colorado.md): the outgoing Senate Bill 24-205 framework (signed 17 May 2024; implementation postponed to 30 June 2026 and enforcement currently frozen pending litigation) casts the core duty as reasonable care to avoid algorithmic discrimination, backed by a deployer risk-management policy and program and an impact assessment, and the incoming Senate Bill 26-189 framework, which repeals and re-enacts it for consequential decisions made on or after 1 January 2027, recasts the core duty as documentation, record-keeping, and point-of-interaction and post-adverse-outcome disclosure for automated decision-making technology. TRAIGA takes a different shape from both: it is organized around a set of intent-based prohibited uses that bind any covered person, a narrower set of prohibitions specific to governmental entities, an AI-interaction disclosure duty that falls primarily on governmental agencies (with a separate duty on health-care providers), a regulatory sandbox, and an advisory council, and it preempts local AI regulation. This annex frames those provisions and cross-references the operational substance rather than restating it; the controlling text is HB 149 as codified.
- Type
- Annex
- Version
- 0.0.10
- Date
- 2026-10-27
- Owner
- Chief Information Security Officer
- Approving authority
- Governance Library Maintainer
- Classification
- Public
- Confidentiality
- Public
- Category
- AI Governance
- Review frequency
- Annual and upon material change to TRAIGA, Attorney-General enforcement activity, or the Chapter 553 sandbox and Chapter 554 council implementation
- Licence
- CC BY-SA 4.0
Read the full text on GitHub (opens in a new tab)
Outline
- Purpose
- Applicable law and regulatory authority
- Transition timeline
- Scope: covered actors and covered systems
- Core obligations
- Consumer rights
- Enforcement
- Regulatory sandbox and the Texas Artificial Intelligence Council
- Relationship to the Texas privacy layer
- Limitations
- Framework alignment
Frameworks it maps to
Related documents
- AI Compliance Policyai
- Colorado AI and Automated Decision-Making Technology Regulatory Requirementsai
- California CCPA Automated Decision-Making Technology (ADMT) Regulatory Requirementsai
- New York City Automated Employment Decision Tool Regulatory Requirementsai
- United States Privacy Regulatory Requirementsprivacy
- Canonical Citations Registergovernance
- Global Regulatory Applicability Registercompliance
Next
All Documents